Last week, I wrote about the ambiguity of research on written corrective feedback (WCF), with some scholars arguing it works…
This article is Part I in a two-part series on error correction. It looks at the lack of evidence that proves written corrective feedback’s effectiveness and why that may be so.
This article looks at an approach to providing feedback on students’ written work that is more valuable, can help enhance learner autonomy, and potentially save teachers time and frustration.
Collaborative Revision in the Writing Classroom
Collaborative revision – where pairs of students work together to revise individual essays – may have a number of benefits for the writing classroom.
Continue Reading →
Blending Offline and Online Feedback on EAP Writing
This study investigated the multifaceted options for giving feedback which are afforded by EAP students submitting their work through the Turnitin platform.
Continue Reading →